Which SC3 species do you consider Canon?

Do you want to *play* with us camper? This is where *fun games* are had!

Moderator: ZFP Peacekeepers

Post Reply
User avatar
ZEXy Beast
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 3:30 am
Location: Hyperspace

Which SC3 species do you consider Canon?

Post by HunamBeing »

Title says it all.


I personally consider the Daktaklakpak, K'tang, Xchagger, Doog, and Vyro-Ingo races canon, due to how nicely they were executed.
User avatar
Yehat Revolutionist
Posts: 684
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:10 am
Location: Sweden

Re: Which SC3 species do you consider Canon?

Post by Quasispatial »

This doesn't belong in *heavy space*. I do believe General Discussion would be a more appropriate *time*.

On another note, I would have to limit myself to the Daktaklakpak there - pretty much the only one that turned out reasonably interesting.
Edit: well, then again, they can't be considered canon since, in order to do so, one would have to bring in a whole shipload of other content (the kind of shipload which wouldn't fit into anything short of the Sa-Matra) into the same status of 'canon', which is not acceptable in my opinion - the majority simply didn't make sense, and bringing them in simply for the sake of making a reason for the Daks' appearance is simply not a worthwhile trade. The Melnorme would scoof at such an unfair rate, surely.
Last edited by Quasispatial on Wed Jul 15, 2015 11:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Sentient life. We are the Ur-Quan. Independence is intolerable. Blah, blah, blah." - the Spathi High Council, Star Control II.
User avatar
Atum-ta the Sixth
Posts: 1416
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:09 am
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Which SC3 species do you consider Canon?

Post by Draxas »

SC3 has no friends here, generally speaking. I personally consider none of the races in SC3 canon, even though a few of them had potential to be interesting.
User avatar
ZFP Peacekeeper
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:12 am
Location: Israel

Re: Which SC3 species do you consider Canon?

Post by Alvarin »

I was sad Harika and Yorn were... dumped... the way they were. I think this symbiosis of sorts could be extremely interestingly executed in competent hands, but it wasn't. Clairconctlar, Xchaggers and the Ploxis had some interesting points, but meh. Rest of them were just bad. Especially those brought from SC2. Man, those Syreen...
To be angry is to punish yourself for the errors of others.
User avatar
Slylandro gasbags
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Which SC3 species do you consider Canon?

Post by Angelfish »

SC3 is a dead end so it's not really worth it considering any of the races or stories in it canon.
I really liked the storyline of the game though. The other gameplay not so much. But then again the mineral gathering in SC2 was also utterly boring.
User avatar
Death 999
ZFP Peacekeeper
Posts: 1727
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:07 pm

Re: Which SC3 species do you consider Canon?

Post by Death 999 »

Ship-wise, Clairconctlar were clever. Harika felt reasonably unique, while the Owa were an interesting alternate to the Cruiser. The Doog were utterly imba, but did raise a bunch of questions about how one could rebalance them.

Talking-wise, Exquivans, Daks, K'Tang, and Owa stood out to me.

But canon? CANON? Heh. No.
User avatar
Yehat Revolutionist
Posts: 662
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:16 am
Location: Illinois

Re: Which SC3 species do you consider Canon?

Post by Dyandod »

I liked the Harika/Yorn a lot, and a few other races were decent.

I tend to think of the SC3 races being canon somewhere in the Star Control universe, but the Captain never actually met them and the events of SC3 never went down. But a lot of the races had potential so I just pretend they're living in some distant, unexplored part of the galaxy.
User avatar
Hunam adventurer
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:01 am
Location: Germany

Re: Which SC3 species do you consider Canon?

Post by Ultron »

I stopped playing SC3 just in the middle of the game ....
Too annoying travel, got always stuck in this semi-3D starcloud because I thought that this other star is just a little distance away - set course - found out that the viewing angle was sort of distracting - ended up with no fuel....
SC1 and SC2 - that´s it !
Silly Supox
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:18 pm

Re: Which SC3 species do you consider Canon?

Post by TSC »

None of them are canon. Unless it's created by Ford and Reiche themselves it can never be canon.

But some SC3 races where funny.

The K'tang where pretty damn hilarious, the bipolar Vyro-Ingo where good for a laugh. The Dak's quasi computer-like way of talking was memorable. The Doogs Forrest Gump/Dumb Dog-esque personality was kind of loveable.

SC3 was not very well designed and was nowhere even near the brilliantly designed masterpiece that SC2 was, and is rightfully non-canonical, but it wasn't the WORST.

It just wasn't very GOOD either.

Many of the other races where forgetable (I don't think the Owa or Exquivan pulled off the knightly and mystic roles of particularly memorable, and the Clairconctlar where certainly pretty boring as well. I also think the Harika's attempt to be scary thuggish brutes just didn't really gel that well. (Though the Yorn thing was somewhat interesting.)

The Ploxis whilst they would have made funny MINOR villains with their goofy quasi-European accented cartoon villainy and telling you all their evil plans, wheren't that great as the bigger villains they where meant to be.

But well... I still love the K'Tang threathening that you will be SMOOSHED forever!
Post Reply